Drawing for WE DEFEND THOSE WHO DEFEND US

USPTO serial 85004476

WE DEFEND THOSE WHO DEFEND US

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE DEFEND THOSE WHO DEFEND US?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jefferson Perkins

JEFFERSON PERKINS Perkins IP Law Group LLC4200 Commerce CourtSuite 310LISLE, IL 60532

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Compound semiconductor epitaxial films formed onto substrates and sold together as a unit; photovoltaic devices, namely, photovoltaic cells and arraysACTIVE—
042research and development services in the field of semiconductor materials and devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 28, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 20, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance