USPTO serial 85005669
VMS APPROVED BY DELAVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VMS APPROVED BY DELAVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE 147 21 TUMBA, SE
SE 147 21 TUMBA, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald M. Kraai
GERALD M. KRAAI LATHROP & GAGE LLP10851 MASTIN ST BLDG 82OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1769UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body wash for animals; laundry bleach, detergent and sizing, cleaning, polishing, scouring and skin abrasive preparations; soaps; washing-up liquids; dishwasher detergents; teat and udder cleaning preparations; udder soap | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Bovine, sheep, goat and horse vaccines and vaccine adjuvants; feed supplements for livestock; medicated nutritional additives for livestock feed; plasters for medical purposes, burn, surgical and wound dressing; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides; fly combating preparations; additives to fodder for medical purposes; medicated teat dipping preparations; disinfectant and softening teat and udder protection preparations; medicated animal washes; cement for animal hooves | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Conveyors; incubators for eggs; milking machines featuring control means, take-off means, milk meter means, vacuum connections and joints; automatic animal feeding machinery, namely, mechanized livestock feeders and parts therefor; fodder presses; teat cups, teat cup liners and flexible tubes for milking machines; vacuum pumps; manure handling machines, namely, manure scrapers, spreaders and pumps for removal, treatment, storage and spreading of manure; livestock feeding machines, namely, mechanized livestock feeders, which store, prepare and distribute feed and liquids; washing machines for milking equipment and milk lines; high pressure washers; professional vacuum cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrical apparatus, namely, milking composition and milk yield recording machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Steam radiators for heating animal enclosures; hot water heaters; electric lighting fixtures; water fountains and purifiers for livestock; agricultural irrigation units; agricultural machinery used in the treatment of milk, namely, pasteurizers for use in the agricultural industry, milk sterilizers, cooling evaporators, and electric dehydrators; refrigeration equipment, namely, milk chilling units; milk filtering units for commercial dairy use; energy recovery ventilators for milk cooling and barn air for commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DeLaval Holding AB
- Other trademarks owned by DeLaval Holding AB
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named VMS APPROVED BY DELAVAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |