USPTO serial 85005899
FANTASTICLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4140915Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2012
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FANTASTICLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Clay dough figurines; Clay figurines; Clay sculptures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 27, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
- Other trademarks owned by Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
- Other trademarks owned by Rob Baxter, U.S. citizen, parent and guardian of Sara G. Baxter
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named FANTASTICLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2023 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 15, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |