USPTO serial 85005975
COURSEADVISOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COURSEADVISOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence R. Hefter
LAURENCE R HEFTER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT DUNNER LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, marketing and promotion services; general business networking referral services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by generating and providing business information and business reference material about educational opportunities through online websites, social media, call centers and other methods; business marketing, namely, providing business lead generation services to others in the field of education; providing interactive marketing programs on websites, though social media, and call centers designed to optimize yield in these areas | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |