USPTO serial 85006468
CLAMPFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLAMPFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody L. Factor
JODY L. FACTOR FACTOR & LAKE, LTD.1327 W WASHINGTON BLVD APT 5G-HCHICAGO, IL 60607-1912UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary products for medical purposes, namely, total parenteral nutrition, infusions, transfusions, injections, blood preservation, drug delivery in the form of liquid to overcome patient-centered case deficiencies; intravenous fluids used for re-hydration, nutrition and the delivery of pharmaceutical preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical, veterinary instruments and apparatuses, namely, roller clamps, tubing clamps, tubing and catheter clamps, tube clips, pinch cocks, syringes, infusion fittings, tubes, hoses, pipes, joints, connectors, seals, supply bags, and cannula systems in the form of iv lines and infusion set tubings, connecting systems consisting of iv lines and tubings, tubing supports, tubing plug systems thereof for dosage, feeding, closure, sealing, transport, measuring and metering, namely, drug and parentaral nutrition delivery devices and systems; medical equipment, namely, drip counters; capillary drainage tubes; capillary reagent tubes; capillary tubes for blood; capillary tubes for samples; drainage tubes for medical purposes; droppers for administering medication, sold empty; infusion sets; injection device for pharmaceuticals; intravenous feeding tubes; medical apparatus and units for dosage, measuring and monitoring, namely, drug delivery devices and systems; medical apparatus, namely, infusion and injection devices for administering drugs; medical devices, namely, tubing and valve assembly set; medical devices, namely, tubing and valve assembly set; medical fluid injectors; medical tubing for drainage, transfusion, administering drugs; transfusion sets; tubing for use with cannulas; tubing for use with catheters; medical tubing for drainage, infusion transfusion, injection, dosing of fluids containing medical substances, administering drugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Synthetic plastic and rubber as semi-finished products in form of hoses, tubes, fittings, seals, joints, connectors; synthetic plastic and rubber as semi-finished products for use in medical products in form of foils, plates, rods, profiles, hoses, tubes, blocks, fittings, seals, joints, connectors; semi-finished injection-molded products of plastic for use in the medical field; partly worked plastics in the form of hoses, tubes, fittings, seals, joints, connectors for use in the medical field; flexible pipes, not of metal; flexible plastic and silicone tubing used for transport of liquids and biologicals for use in the pharmaceutical and medical industries; non-metal pipe couplings and joints; non-metal tubing and tubing couplings for joining and terminating pipes; non-metallic flexible pipes; non-metallic hoses and flexible pipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |