USPTO serial 85007072
THE SPRING LAKE 5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2012
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SPRING LAKE 5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FRIENDS OF THE SPRING LAKE 5, A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Spring Lake, NJ
Other trademarks owned by FRIENDS OF THE SPRING LAKE 5, A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION
FRIENDS OF THE SPRING LAKE 5, A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Spring Lake, NJ
Other trademarks owned by FRIENDS OF THE SPRING LAKE 5, A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian L. Petrequin
BRIAN L. PETREQUIN LECLAIRRYAN1037 RAYMOND BLVD FL1 RIVERFRONT PLZ FL 16NEWARK, NJ 07102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Athletic and sports event services, namely, arranging, organizing, operating and conducting road races | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIENDS OF THE SPRING LAKE 5, A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FRIENDS OF THE SPRING LAKE 5, A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE SPRING LAKE 5
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |