Drawing for PERCEPTIVITY

USPTO serial 85007676

PERCEPTIVITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PERCEPTIVITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine K. Garcia

Christine K. Garcia Lexmark International, Inc.740 West New Circle RoadBuilding 82-1 LegalLexington, KY 40550

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in non-programmatically linking and integrating documents and content with host software applications and viewing such linked and integrated documents and content; computer software for use in integrating documents and content with host software applications, capturing data from host software applications and native software applications for use in integrated document management; computer software for workflow applications, namely, automating the process of modifying documents, capturing data from documents, moving documents from user to user, organizing documents on computer networks and exchanging documents and data with software and hardware applications; computer software for use in integrated content management, workflow, electronic document management and in finding, accessing, processing, securing, managing, applying and integrating unstructured content; computer software for use in document management, namely, accessing, viewing, storing, routing, integrating, linking, imaging, capturing content from, searching for, retrieving, controlling versions of and controlling security for documents; computer software for imaging, namely, scanning of paper documents, modifying scanned images and converting scanned images to searchable, editable documentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 11, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance