USPTO serial 85008702
CONSILIENCE PURPLE BEAST RED WINE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3879549Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2010
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONSILIENCE PURPLE BEAST RED WINE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS OLIVOS, CA
Los Olivos, CA
Los Olivos, CA
Los Olivos, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Pfau
MICHAEL E. PFAU REICKER PFAU PYLE & MCROY, LLP1421 STATE STSTE BSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101-2507Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ESCALERA-BOULET, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Consilience Winery
- Other trademarks owned by Consilience Winery
- Other trademarks owned by Consilience Winery
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CONSILIENCE PURPLE BEAST RED WINE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |