USPTO serial 85008781
I. C. ANJULS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I. C. ANJULS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ladera Ranch, CA
Ladera Ranch, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Regard
JOSEPH T. REGARD JOSEPH T. REGARD, LTD PLCPO BOX 429MADISONVILLE, LA 70447-0429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Children's toys, namely, wings, halos, and wands, stuffed toy animals, toy swords, building blocks, puppets; children's dolls, doll clothing, doll accessories; action figures, action figure clothing and action figure accessories; games, namely, board games, card games, and role playing games and props therefor, puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Streaming of audio/video material on the Internet featuring children's educational and entertainment material, instructional material, interactive educational and entertainment programs, social development material, self awareness material, and spiritual development material | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website featuring educational information in the fields of social development, self awareness, education, entertainment, and spiritual development for pre-adolescents featuring streaming audio/video and flash animation interactive programming; Providing a website featuring information in the field of self awareness, education in the field of spirituality, decision making skills, and morality, problem solving, feelings and recognition of feelings, self awareness, promoting good mental health, and relationship building, and entertainment for pre-adolescents featuring streaming audio/video and flash animation interactive programming | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing a website for creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussion, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing a website featuring information in the field of social development, namely, decision making skills, morality, problem solving, feelings and recognition of feelings, self awareness, promoting good mental health, and relationship building; Providing a website featuring information in the field of spiritual development for pre-adolescents, featuring streaming audio/video and flash animation interactive programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by I. C. ANJULS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by I. C. ANJULS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named I. C. ANJULS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |