Drawing for HARDFLIP

USPTO serial 85009014

HARDFLIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARDFLIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

Raj Abhyanker LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C.446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing products, namely, tshirts, sweaters, jackets, ski pants, sweat pants, jeans, shorts, bikinis, socks, boxers, briefs, pajamas, gloves as apparel, hats, caps, and shoes for consumersACTIVE—
028Toys and sporting goods, namely, skate boards, snow boards and skis for consumersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 11, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 11, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 28, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance