Drawing for CONNECTING PATIENTS TO SAFETY

USPTO serial 85009179

CONNECTING PATIENTS TO SAFETY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONNECTING PATIENTS TO SAFETY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Anne Matheson

JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON ET AL, LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical connectors and couplings for drug delivery; syringes; catheters; filters, namely, filters used with drug administration and blood sampling devices; adapters for use with drug administration; caps for connectors in connecting infusion tubes; kits for epidural anesthesia comprised of delivery apparatus and syringes; kits for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia comprised of delivery apparatus and syringes; epidural and spinal needles; medical tubing and extension sets for drug delivery; and drug infusion line stopcocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2015PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 7, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 21, 2013RFRRREQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 1, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2010ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION—
Dec 20, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance