USPTO serial 85009182
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kwai Chung, N.T.,, HK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Tucker Barr, Esq.
J TUCKER BARR ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP171 17TH STREET NWSUITE 2100ATLANTA, GA 30363-1031| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Freight logistics management | ACTIVE | Feb 13, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |