Drawing for ACROPETAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

USPTO serial 85009368

ACROPETAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ACROPETAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kavitha Akula

KAVITHA AKULA AKULA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.1303 W WALNUT HILL LN STE 225IRVING, TX 75038-2949UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment counseling and recruiting; Employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; Personnel placement and recruitment; Personnel recruitment services and employment agencies; Professional staffing and recruiting servicesACTIVEApr 25, 2001
042Computer software development; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Customized software development services; Database design and development; Database development services; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Design, development and implementation of softwareACTIVEApr 25, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance