USPTO serial 85010169
GLOBAL EXCELLENCE IN MICROSURGERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4204270Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2012
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLOBAL EXCELLENCE IN MICROSURGERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Synovis Life Technologies, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Synovis Life Technologies, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Synovis Life Technologies, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY C. NICHOLS
JEFFREY C. NICHOLS IN-HOUSE COUNSEL FOR REGISTRANTONE BAXTER PARKWAYDEERFIELD, IL 60015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Microvascular anastomotic couplers for performing anastomosis and monitoring parameters during and after surgery; absorbable woven polyglycolic acid mesh tube for use in joining severed nerves to allow regeneration and rejoining of nerves; surgical microclips; surgical headlamp | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Synovis Life Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Synovis Life Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Synovis Life Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named GLOBAL EXCELLENCE IN MICROSURGERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |