USPTO serial 85010289
THE PROVEN CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PROVEN CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Nichols
One Baxter ParkwayDF2-1WDeerfield, IL 60015Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical implants comprising artificial materials for use in joining severed nerves to allow regeneration and rejoining of nerves | ACTIVE | May 30, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |