USPTO serial 85010458
CLOUDMOBILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOUDMOBILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. Coleman
Brian R. Coleman PERKINS COIE LLP3150 PORTER DRIVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in providing virtual desktop services and application rental services; computer server software for creating and managing virtual desktop functionality for clients; software for transmitting data, graphics, audio or video over electronic communications networks; computer software for the transmission, reception, coding or decoding of voice, data or multimedia content to allow remote access to, monitoring of, or control of, computer hardware, computer software or electronic communications devices; computer operating system software to deploy, manage and access applications; computer software used to stream software applications over networks, including the Internet; computer software for managing and accessing computer applications; computer software for self-service provisioning of computer applications; computer software for monitoring and providing reports on application usage; computer hardware; electronic devices namely, personal computing devices, laptops, desktops and televisions for use in accessing virtual desktop and application rental services; computer networking devices, namely components for establishing a connection to a virtual desktop and application rental service; computer software for use in establishing and accessing online desktop services and application rental services; computer hardware device in the nature of personal computers, laptops, mobile phones, televisions, and computing hardware for creating and managing virtual desktop functionality for clients; Computing devices that provide software for transmitting data, graphics, audio or video over electronic communications networks, computer software for the transmission, reception, coding or decoding of voice, data or multimedia content to allow remote access of, monitoring of, or control of, computer software or electronic communications devices in the nature of mobile phones, personal computers, laptops, and televisions; computer hardware device for use in accessing computer software applications of others; Computing device for use in rental of computer software used in the field of global computer information networks; Computing device for hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, files, and databases for others via a virtual desktop available via a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; rental of computer software used in the field of global computer information networks; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, files, and databases for others via a virtual desktop available via a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |