CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ORTHOSTELL

USPTO serial 85010459

ORTHOSTELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORTHOSTELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie C. Jennings

JULIE C. JENNINGS SENNIGER POWERS LLP100 N BROADWAY FL 17SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102-2728UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal alloys in the form of solid metal powder layers applied to metal substrates in the manufacture of surgical and orthopedic implants made of metal; metal alloys in the form of solid metal powder layers applied to metal substrates for surgical and orthopedic implants made of metalACTIVE—
040metal alloy coating services involving material transformation of the surface of surgical and orthopedic implants during manufacture by application of solid metal alloy layers; custom manufacture of surgical and orthopedic implants made of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 17, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 22, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 4, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 4, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance