Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85010681?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85010681. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns COREFITNESSROLLER?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85010681, the listed owner(s) include: ANNOVIUM PRODUCTS, LLC, DARYA BRONSTON.

What is USPTO serial number 85010681?

Serial number 85010681 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark COREFITNESSROLLER. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of COREFITNESSROLLER?

COREFITNESSROLLER (85010681) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover COREFITNESSROLLER?

The public record lists International Classes: 010, 028. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85010681

COREFITNESSROLLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Apr 9, 2010
Status date: Apr 9, 2014
Registration date: —
Examiner: POWELL, LINDA
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COREFITNESSROLLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

ANNOVIUM PRODUCTS, LLC
Goleta, CA
Other trademarks owned by ANNOVIUM PRODUCTS, LLC
DARYA BRONSTON
Santa Barbara, CA
Other trademarks owned by DARYA BRONSTON

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LANEFOURTH FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
010	Exercise devices, namely, foam fitness rollers specially adapted for therapeutic purposes for use in physical rehabilitation, rehabilitative exercise and therapeutic rehabilitative movements	ACTIVE	—
028	exercise devices, namely, fitness rollers; accessories for fitness rollers, namely, extension arms, fitted foam bag covers with padded interfaces, fitted covers, and fitted storage bags, all for use in the fields of general fitness, balance training, functional training, quadrant training, proprioceptive training, exercise, pilates-style exercise, cardio exercise, strength training and core strengthening exercise	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 14, 2014	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 9, 2014	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 9, 2014	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 24, 2014	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Sep 17, 2013	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Sep 17, 2013	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Sep 17, 2013	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Jul 29, 2013	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 22, 2013	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 22, 2013	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 22, 2013	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Apr 24, 2013	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Feb 14, 2013	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Feb 14, 2013	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Feb 14, 2013	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Feb 13, 2013	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Feb 13, 2013	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Feb 9, 2013	AAUA	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED	—
Feb 8, 2013	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
Feb 1, 2013	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Jan 25, 2013	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Jan 25, 2013	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Jan 25, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 25, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 25, 2013	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Aug 14, 2012	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Aug 14, 2012	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2012	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 23, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 23, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2012	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Mar 9, 2012	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Feb 21, 2012	EWAF	TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS	—
Feb 18, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 27, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 27, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2011	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Jul 31, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2011	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 7, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 7, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2011	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 13, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 13, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2010	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2010	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2010	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 16, 2010	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED	—
Apr 15, 2010	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Apr 13, 2010	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—