Drawing for H20 PATROL

USPTO serial 85010725

H20 PATROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H20 PATROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Kreider Gaunt

Karen Kreider Gaunt Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 East Fifth Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, party and event planning for social entertainment purposes; providing recreational areas in the nature of children's play areas; arranging, organizing, conducting and hosting birthday parties; hosting live performances by costumed characters; educational and membership club services, namely, providing members educational workshops in the fields of oceanic aquatic environments, and species of oceanic animals and distribution of educational materials in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 7, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 31, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 7, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 8, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 3, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 19, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance