Drawing for BIVERGENCE

USPTO serial 85010744

BIVERGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIVERGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Wickersham

Michael Wickersham Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, et. al.333 Earle Ovington Blvd.Suite 1010Uniondale, NY 11553

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Preparation of special effects including image processing, computer generated graphics, computer generated imagery and conversion of two-dimensional images into three-dimensional images for use in the production and post-production of commercials; post-production of commercials and post-production editing of commercialsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, preparation of special effects including image processing, computer generated graphics, computer generated imagery and conversion of two-dimensional images into three-dimensional images for use in the production and post production of motion pictures, television, videos, digital videos, motion picture film clips, video film clips and trailers; post production editing of motion pictures, television, videos, motion picture film clips, video film clips and trailersACTIVE—
042Technical consultation services in the fields of image processing, computer generated graphics and imagery, and conversion of two dimensional images into three dimensional imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 20, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance