USPTO serial 85010831
VERTICHEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERTICHEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor N. King
Victor N. King Speckman Law Group PLLC2014B E. Union StreetSeattle, WA 98122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Specialty chemicals derived from lignin stream, namely, Carbon fiber and composites precursors, Carbonylated chemicals, Catchols, Cresols, Resorcinols, Concrete cure retarders and plasticizers, Coniferaldehyde, Coniferols, Coniferyl alcohol, Copolymers with HMF, Cumen, Cyclohexane, Cyclohexanol, Cyclohexanone, Diaminotoluene, Emulsifiers, Emulsion stabilizers, Epoxidized lignin, Esterified (Acetoxy), Ethoxylated chemicals, Eugenol, Macromonomers in polyester, Urethane polymers, Epoxy polymers and other polymers, Nitrophenols, Organic acids, Oxidized lignin, Polyelectorlytes, Polyhydroxy aromatics, Polymer alloys, Polymer extender, Polymer modifiers, Additives that improve various polymer physical or performance properties, Polymerized lignin, Resin crosslinker, Sealants, Adhesives, Vanillic acid, Vanillic acid methyl ester, Vanillin, Vanillyl alcohol, Wood preservative, Alpha-carboxyvanillin; Specialty chemicals derived from lignin stream, namely, 3-hydroxybutyrolactone (3-HBL), 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), Aspartic acid; Specialty chemicals derived from lignin and sugar stream, namely, hydorgen; Specialty chemicals derived from cellulose stream, namely, Carboxymethylcellulose, Cellulose acetate, Cellulose sulfate, Diethylaminocellulose, Methylcellulose, Nitrocellulose; Specialty chemicals derived from xylan stream, namely, Xylitol, Xylonic acid, Xylooligosaccharides, Xylose | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Biomass feedstocks, products of biomass processing, namely, biofuels | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Processing of biomass to produce products and specialty chemicals; processing of biomass to produce biofuels | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and development services in the field of specialty chemicals, biomass, products of biomass processing, biofuels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VERTICHEM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Pure Power Global Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Pure Power Global Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VERTICHEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |