USPTO serial 85011168
LOCUS FINANCIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOCUS FINANCIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HAMILTON, BM
HAMILTON, BM
Hamilton, HM 11, BM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon Palmer
SHELDON PALMER GALVIN & PALMER630 3RD AVE FL 23NEW YORK, NY 10017-6731UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for integrating various databases in the fields of business, finance and economics; all of the above not in the fields of automobiles or land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, books and pamphlets containing information on the classification of companies and securities; and printed indices used for measuring stock and other financial instruments' performance of representative samples of companies in selected groups of countries; all of the above not in the fields of automobiles or land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing information in the field of economics; not in the fields of automobiles or land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial information services, namely, providing financial classification information for companies, securities, jobs, resources and any other discrete part of an economic system; providing financial data; financial services, namely, providing fund, mutual fund or any other portfolio investment services; providing financial information in the field of retirement planning and retirement plan administration services; investment management services; securities and investment brokerage services; and providing information in the fields of investment and finance; all of the above not in the fields of automobiles or land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOCUS, LP
- Other trademarks owned by LOCUS, LP
- Other trademarks owned by Datagrids, Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named LOCUS FINANCIAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |