CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MARGARITAVILLE PARADISE KEY TEAS

USPTO serial 85012015

MARGARITAVILLE PARADISE KEY TEAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARGARITAVILLE PARADISE KEY TEAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Smith, Esq. and Kristen L. Fancher, Esq.

JEFFREY M. SMITH AND KRISTEN L. FANCHER GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP3333 Piedmont Road NE, Suite 2500ATLANTA, GA 30305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Tea, fruit tea, green tea, black tea, herbal tea, iced tea; prepared coffee and coffee based beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 3, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 1, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 5, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 2, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 7, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 18, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance