USPTO serial 85012028
JD JACQUI & DAVID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JD JACQUI & DAVID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesus Sanchelima, Esq
JESUS SANCHELIMA, ESQ SANCHELIMA & ASSOCIATES, P.A.235 S LE JEUNE RDMIAMI, FL 33134-1762UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body creams; body butter; body lotions; body oils; massage oil; body powder; body scrub; body sprays; body mists; body washes; face and body creams; scented body lotions and creams; scented body spray; scented body mists; perfumed creams; perfumed powder; perfumed soaps; perfumed talcum powder; perfumes; perfuming sachets; eau de parfum; moisturizing creams; eye liner; eye make-up; eye pencils; eye shadows; mascaras; lip gloss; lipsticks; lip gloss palatte; lip liner; blush; bath beads; bath gels; skin cleansers; body exfoliating lotion, whipped hydrating lotions for skin; facial and body masks; foot scrubs; non-medicated foot creams; aftershave; blush; eye shadow; cologne; deodorant for personal use; cosmetics for hair, namely, shampoo, conditioner, relaxers, detanglers, non-medicated hair treatments, styling and molding gels, oil moisturizers, cholesterol hair creams, spritzes, setting lotions, hair polishers, hair pomades, hot oil treatments, leave-in treatments, foam wraps lotions, and braid sprays; and cosmetics for skin care, namely, alfa-hydroxy acid creams, beta-hydroxy acid creams, depilatories, razor bump cream, non-medicated acne preparations, stretch mark cream, toners, cleansing creams, facial scrubs, clarifying skin treatment and fade creams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JACQUI & DAVID, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Jacqui & David, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Jacqui & David, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named JD JACQUI & DAVID
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |