USPTO serial 85012177
PRO SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Hill
THOMAS E HILL WILDMAN HARROLD ALLEN & DIXON LLP225 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machinery and implements, namely, seed planting machines, row cleaners in the nature of plows, residue coulters, fertilizer spreaders, seed planters in the nature of sowers, and seeders for preparing an improved no-till or minimum till seedbed | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |