USPTO serial 85012339
MAKING SAFETY HAPPEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAKING SAFETY HAPPEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Parrish Lake
Catherine Parrish Lake Stoel Rives LLP201 South Main Street, Suite 1100Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for traffic control, namely, red light cameras; photo radar devices, speed cameras, intersection safety cameras, road safety cameras, speed safety cameras, bus lane or HOV lane enforcement cameras, automated license plate recognition cameras; apparatus for measuring speed, namely, laser, radar, time-over-distance, and video image frame speed calculation devices; red-light cameras; computer programs, namely, software for processing data recorded with the instruments and apparatus as mentioned here-above; automobile surveillance equipment, namely, devices for detecting speed and red light violations; Computer software and hardware for determining speed; Cameras; Digital cameras; Video cameras; Speed indicators, namely, laser, radar, time-over-distance, and video image frame speed calculation devices. Automobile traffic monitoring equipment, namely, computer software for detecting and recording traffic violations and violations of speed limits, red lights, railroad crossing signals and toll booths; for processing and manipulating traffic images; for assessing and utilizing computerized database consisting of traffic information, motor vehicle registration, and for producing and generating reports and citations; vehicle surveillance equipment, namely, apparatuses for detecting the presence of vehicles; apparatuses for detecting speed, and red light violations; and apparatuses for photographing and recording vehicles; automobile surveillance equipment, namely, cameras, video recording apparatuses, data loggers, vehicle detectors, train detectors and cabinets for detecting signal violations at railroad crossings; photographic and cinematographic equipment; namely, radar speed cameras, solar powered speed cameras, traffic red light surveillance cameras; measuring equipment, namely, apparatus and instruments for evaluation of knee laxity; signaling equipment, namely, speed checking apparatus and instruments; recording equipment, namely, timing touch pads; video and still image recorders, digital image recorders, laser-based speed detectors, digital-based speed detectors, video-based speed detectors, image processing equipment and software, citation processing equipment and software, and integrated systems thereof, all for vehicle monitoring, traffic control, or traffic enforcement; computer hardware and software for traffic monitoring, pattern recognition, traffic information processing and traffic light control, all in the field of motor vehicle traffic management; computer hardware and software for traffic monitoring, pattern recognition, traffic information processing and traffic light control, all in the field of motor vehicle traffic management. computerized video based traffic surveillance system comprised of video cameras, local controller, and network servers, for detecting and analyzing vehicular traffic flow and road conditions; computer system comprising electronic hardware and software and a video camera for detecting and identifying motor vehicles moving at speeds in access of a prescribed speed limit; computer hardware and computer software for implementing artificial intelligence, neural networks and adaptive systems; electronic system consisting of application software running on a PC or PC-equivalent electronics, a video capture hardware card and a neural network recognition accelerator card that acquires video images of a traffic scene, interprets the images to detect and track vehicles approaching an intersection, measures their speeds and determines whether they will stop when a traffic light cycles to red, providing an indication when it is safe for vehicles and pedestrians to cross the street; additionally, the system will track and record identifying information on red-light vehicles for enforcement purposes; computer software for recognizing characters from images | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computerized database management, production and generation of traffic reports, namely, toll way usage reports, registration compliance reports, insurance compliance reports, and speed, red light and other traffic violation citations for government entities | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Highway toll collection services; automated traffic monitoring, namely, processing of toll payment and toll violations; financial affairs, namely, public finance, leasing and lease purchase financing | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation and maintenance of camera equipment, digital signal processing units, and computer systems for use in traffic monitoring and control ; troubleshooting of computer hardware problems in the nature of repair | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | storage of graphical and textual data to enable automated collection of toll payments from fleet vehicle owners and individual subscribers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | photo-electronic, video, and photographic imaging of vehicles and traffic conditions, and custom design of computer software and computerized camera systems for use in traffic control; Providing online non-downloadable software for use in traffic violation detection, imaging of traffic and traffic violations, verification of traffic violations, traffic violation notice production, transaction management, payment processing, enforcement of traffic laws, customer service, and violation and transaction reporting for use in the field of traffic safety and law enforcement; technical support services for traffic safety and law enforcement, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware problems in the nature of diagnosing hardware problems; troubleshooting of computer and troubleshooting of computer software problems, and monitoring of network systems used in traffic violation detection, imaging, verification, notice production, transaction management, payment processing, enforcement, customer service, and violation and transaction reporting; computer engineering consultation services, namely, design and implementation of computer hardware and computer software; Installation and maintenance of computer software; computer programming and development; software development, particularly destined for processing data recorded by apparatus for traffic control; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for online customer support services, featuring captured video segments of vehicular traffic events and enabling an online user to view such video for the processing and management of traffic citation issuance, prosecution, disposition and collection; design, and engineering and consulting services in the field of traffic monitoring, traffic enforcement and traffic safety; technical support services for traffic safety and law enforcement, namely, traffic violation detection, imaging, verification, data compilation, and citation processing. engineering services, research and development services in the field of motor vehicle traffic management; recording and processing of graphical and textual data to enable automated collection of toll payments from fleet vehicle owners and individual subscribers | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Digital video monitoring, namely, monitoring traffic violations with digital video cameras; Electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of traffic enforcement and monitoring; Monitoring security systems; providing intelligence, data, evidence and assistance to state and local law enforcement agencies relating to traffic enforcement and safety; digital video monitoring, namely, digital velocity and position detection, recording and monitoring and detection, recording and monitoring of traffic violations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MAKING SAFETY HAPPEN
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |