USPTO serial 85012457
BAUMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAUMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jakarta 12920, ID
Jakarta 12920, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline G. Boehm
CAROLINE G. BOEHM SPRINGUT LAW PC20 FL45 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Smart card milling machines; smart card chip embedding machines; smart card personalization machines; document inserting machines; laser engraving machines and off-set printing machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Automatic voltage regulators for electric power; power conditioners; uninterruptible electrical power supplies; electrical isolation transformers; transient suppressors; inverters; rectifiers; auto transformers; variable transformers; batteries; circuit breakers; electrical panels; electrical connectors; automatic transfer switches; dot matrix and laser paper printers; electronic data capture terminals; POS terminals and smart card terminals and readers; authentication systems and devices for secure e-transactions, Internet transactions and mobile phone transactions; electronic video surveillance products, namely, electronic components of security systems and electronic access control and monitoring systems for buildings; biometrics devices, namely, access control devices; facsimile machines; fire fighting equipment, namely, water cannons; computers; word processors; computer software programs, namely, operating system software and application software used in connection with encoding, reading and/or administering data provided to and/or received from, chip encoded, magnetically encoded and/or electronically readable cards and smart cards, radio frequency identification cards, telephone cards, and secure financial cards, namely, magnetically and chip encoded credit cards, ATM/debit cards and prepaid cards; modems; computer monitors; digital voice recorders; cash registers; mobile phones; single channel radio communication machines; blank smart cards; radio frequency identification tags; magnetic cards; subscriber identity module cards; magnetically encoded and/or electronically readable credit cards, debit cards, gift cards, pre-paid debit cards and re-chargeable debit cards and ID cards for use in connection with payment of goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |