USPTO serial 85012765
INTEGRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4547814Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2014
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arden, NC
Arden, NC
Asheville, NC
Asheville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
JAMES M. BAGARAZZI DORITY & MANNING, P.A.PO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management of facilities for manufacturing torrefied biomass | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2014 |
| 037 | Consulting services in the field of constructing facilities for manufacturing torrefied biomass | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2014 |
| 042 | Designing torrefaction processes for others; conducting torrefaction research and development for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2014 |
| 045 | Licensing of use of facilities for manufacturing torrefied biomass; licensing torrefaction processes for use by others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRO EARTH FUELS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRO EARTH FUELS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRO EARTH FUELS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRO EARTH FUELS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named INTEGRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |