USPTO serial 85012929
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne M. Underwald
SUZANNE M. UNDERWALD DOW LOHNES PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-6805UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, toys and playthings, namely, action skill games; action target games; amusement game machines; arcade games; baby multiple activity toys; basketball table top games; bath toys; bean bags; bendable toys; billiard game playing equipment; bingo game playing equipment; board games; bobble head dolls; bubble making wand and solution sets; building games; cases for play accessories; children's multiple activity toys; children's multiple activity tables; children's play cosmetics; children's art activity toys not including arts and crafts clay kits or paint kits; collectible toy figures; construction toys; costume masks; crib mobiles; crib toys; electric action toys; electronic educational game machines for children; electronic learning toys; electronic toy vehicles; non-electronic toy vehicles; puppets; infant toys; infant rattles; jigsaw and manipulative puzzles; juggling equipment; kaleidoscopes; kites; magic tricks; marbles; memory games; mobiles for children; scale model vehicles; musical toys; paper airplanes; parlor games; party games; pinball-type games; play balloons; play wands; plush toys; pull toys; push toys; ride-on toys; rocking horses; sandbox toys; snow globes; spinning tops; squeeze toys; stacking toys; talking toys; wind-up toys; toy banks; toy butterfly nets; toy modeling dough; card games; toy model hobby craft kits; soft sculpture toys; puzzles; toy action figures and accessories therefor; play figures; dolls and accessories and playsets therefor; yo-yos; gymnastics and sporting articles not included in other classes, namely, gymnastic apparatus; balls for games; sport balls; exercise balls; basketball game playing equipment in the nature of basketballs, hoops, nets and backboards. soccer game playing equipment in the nature of balls, nets and goals; baseball game playing equipment in the nature of baseballs, bats, bases and mitts; badminton game playing equipment in the nature of rackets, shuttlecocks, poles and nets; hockey game playing equipment in the nature of hockey sticks, pucks, nets and goals; dart game playing equipment in the nature of darts and dartboards; football game playing equipment in the nature of footballs and goalposts; table tennis game playing equipment in the nature of paddles, table tennis balls, table tennis tables and nets; tennis game playing equipment in the nature of tennis balls, rackets and nets; golf game playing equipment in the nature of golf clubs, golf balls, tees, divot repair tools; volleyball game playing equipment in the nature of volleyballs, poles and nets; cases specially adapted for sports equipment; croquet sets; disc toss toys; ice skates; in-line skates; roller skates; jump ropes; jungle gyms; netballs; nets for ball games; nets for sports; paddle ball games; personal exercise mats; yoga mats; play swimming pools; play tents; playground equipment, namely, sandboxes; playground slides; swing sets; see-saws; skateboards; skipping ropes; sleds for use in downhill amusement rides; trampolines; decorations for Christmas trees; pet toys; and playing cards | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |