USPTO serial 85013369
LUNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Air and surface sanitizing product, namely, non-filter electrical appliance for air sanitation; nano photo catalytic titanium dioxide air purification system namely a TiO2 nano Nickel HCT PCO proprietary catalyst air purifier with a titanium dioxide chamber to remove harmful micro-organisms and toxins in the air and on surfaces for hospitals, clinics, day care centers, factories and offices, kindergartens, schools and colleges, public and private transport, hotels, restaurants and bars, supermarkets and wholesale storage, theaters and public entertainment venues, indoor arena's and shopping malls, airports, metro stations and trains and homes | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2009 |
| 010 | Air purification and medical sanitation instrument, namely, medical cleansing appliance, electrical appliance for air sanitation using a nano photo catalytic titanium dioxide air purification system containing proprietary catalyst technology namely TiO2 nano Nickel HCT PCO catalyst to remove harmful micro organisms and toxins in the air and on surfaces for hospitals, clinics, day care centers, factories and offices, kindergartens, schools and colleges, public and private transport, hotels, restaurants and bars, supermarkets and wholesale storage, theaters and public entertainment venues, indoor arena's and shopping malls, airports, metro stations and trains and homes | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2009 |
| 011 | Environmental control instrument products for air sanitation, namely, electrical appliances for air sanitation with nano photo catalytic titanium dioxide air purification and proprietary catalyst technology, namely TiO2 nano Nickel HCT PCO catalyst to remove harmful micro organisms and toxins in the air and on surfaces for hospitals, clinics, day care centers, factories and offices, kindergartens, schools and colleges, public and private transport, hotels, restaurants and bars, supermarkets and wholesale storage, theaters and public entertainment venues, indoor arena's and shopping malls, airports, metro stations and trains and homes | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |