CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CONSTELLATION ELECTRIC CLEANENERGY

USPTO serial 85013907

CONSTELLATION ELECTRIC CLEANENERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSTELLATION ELECTRIC CLEANENERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana O. Lynch

DANA O. LYNCH WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON L.L.P.7 SAINT PAUL STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-1626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035energy usage management service in the nature of providing renewable energy certificates which may then be redeemed for energy; energy risk management services, namely, providing a service that allows customers to purchase renewable energy in fixed amounts or based on a percentage of use; promoting the use of renewable energy by arranging the purchase, offer and exchange of renewable energy certificatesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 21, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 20, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 22, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance