USPTO serial 85014489
ATS AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 2013
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ATS AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
Scottsdale, AZ
American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
Tempe, AZ
American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
Mesa, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Parrish Lake
Catherine Parrish Lake Dorsey & Whitney LLP111 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 2100SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ apparatus for traffic control, namely, traffic law enforcement; apparatus for measuring speed, namely, laser, radar, time-over-distance, and video image frame speed calculation devices; red-light cameras; apparatus for reading out film recordings; computer programs, namely, software for processing data recorded with the instruments and apparatus as mentioned here-above; automobile surveillance equipment, namely, devices for detecting speed and red light violations; Computer software and hardware for determining speed; Cameras; Digital cameras; Video cameras; Speed indicators, namely, laser, radar, time-over-distance, and video image frame speed calculation devices; Automobile traffic monitoring equipment, namely, computer software for detecting and recording traffic violations and violations of speed limits, red lights, railroad crossing signals and toll booths; for processing and manipulating traffic images; for assessing and utilizing computerized database consisting of traffic information, motor vehicle registration, and for producing and generating reports and citations; vehicle surveillance equipment, namely, apparatuses for detecting vehicles; apparatuses for detecting speed, and red light violations; and apparatuses for photographing and recording vehicles; automobile surveillance equipment, namely, cameras, video recording apparatuses, data loggers, vehicle detectors, train detectors and cabinets for detecting signal violations at railroad crossings; photographic and cinematographic equipment, namely, radar speed cameras, [solar powered speed cameras], traffic red light surveillance cameras; measuring equipment, namely, apparatus and instruments for evaluation of knee laxity; signaling equipment, namely, speed checking apparatus and instruments; recording equipment, namely, timing touch pads; video and still image recorders, digital image recorders, laser-based speed detectors, digital-based speed detectors, video-based speed detectors, image processing equipment and software, citation processing equipment and software, and integrated systems thereof, all for vehicle monitoring, traffic control, or traffic enforcement; computer hardware and software for traffic monitoring, pattern recognition, traffic information processing and traffic light control, all in the field of motor vehicle traffic management; computer hardware and software for traffic monitoring, pattern recognition, traffic information processing and traffic light control, all in the field of motor vehicle traffic management; computerized video based traffic surveillance system comprised of video cameras, local controller, and network servers, for detecting and analyzing vehicular traffic flow and road conditions; computer system comprising electronic hardware and software and a video camera for detecting and identifying motor vehicles moving at speeds in access of a prescribed speed limit; computer hardware and computer software for implementing artificial intelligence, neural networks and adaptive systems; electronic system consisting of application software running on a PC or PC-equivalent electronics, a video capture hardware card and a neural network recognition accelerator card that acquires video images of a traffic scene, interprets the images to detect and track vehicles approaching an intersection, measures their speeds and determines whether they will stop when a traffic light cycles to red, providing an indication when it is safe for vehicles and pedestrians to cross the street; additionally, the system will track and record identifying information on red-light vehicles for enforcement purposes; computer software for recognizing characters from images ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2004 |
| 035 | [ computerized database management, production and generation of traffic reports, namely, toll way usage reports, registration compliance reports, insurance compliance reports; data compilation ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 2004 |
| 036 | [ Highway toll collection services; automated traffic monitoring, namely, processing of toll payment and toll violations; financial affairs, namely, public finance, leasing and lease purchase financing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 2004 |
| 037 | [ installation and maintenance of camera equipment, digital signal processing units, and computer systems for use in traffic monitoring and control ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2004 |
| 039 | [ storage of graphical and textual data to enable automated collection of toll payments from fleet vehicle owners and individual subscribers ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2004 |
| 042 | photo-electronic, video, and photographic imaging and recording of vehicles and traffic conditions [, and custom design of computer software ] and computerized camera systems for use in traffic control; Providing online non-downloadable software for use in traffic violation detection, imaging of traffic and traffic violations, verification of traffic violations, traffic violation notice production, transaction management, payment processing, enforcement of traffic laws, customer service, and violation and transaction reporting for use in the field of traffic safety and law enforcement; [ technical support services for traffic safety and law enforcement, namely, monitoring of network systems used in traffic violation detection, imaging, verification, notice production, transaction management, payment processing, enforcement, customer service, and violation and transaction reporting; computer engineering consultation services, namely, design and implementation of computer hardware and computer software; Installation and maintenance of computer software; computer programming and development; software development, particularly destined for processing data recorded by apparatus for traffic control; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for online customer support services, featuring captured video segments of vehicular traffic events and enabling an online user to view such video for the processing and management of traffic citation issuance, prosecution, disposition and collection; design, engineering; technical support services for traffic safety and law enforcement, namely, engineering services, research and development services in the field of motor vehicle traffic management; ] recording, and processing of graphical and textual data to enable automated collection of toll payments from fleet vehicle owners and individual subscribers [ ; troubleshooting of computer hardware problems in the nature of diagnosing hardware problems ] | ACTIVE | Apr 26, 2004 |
| 045 | [ Digital video monitoring, namely, monitoring traffic violations with digital video cameras; Electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of traffic enforcement and monitoring; Monitoring security systems; providing intelligence, data, evidence and assistance to state and local law enforcement agencies relating to traffic enforcement and safety; digital video monitoring, namely, digital velocity and position detection, recording and monitoring and detection, recording and monitoring of traffic violations; production and generation of a traffic safety report about speed, redlight and other traffic violation citations for government entities; consulting services in the field of traffic monitoring, safety consulting and traffic enforcement in the nature of legal enforcement; Traffic monitoring in the nature of monitoring traffic violations via camera; detection to prevent violation of laws ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Traffic Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ATS AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 2, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |