USPTO serial 85014746
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Christophe, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Domenica N.S. Hartman
DOMENICA N.S. HARTMAN HARTMAN & HARTMAN, P.C.552 E 700 NVALPARAISO, IN 46383-9729UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Robot machines; robot machines for use in education and research; robot machines for use in assembly of machines or in building component parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic transportable constructions; construction parts that are modular construction parts not made of metal; sets and kits that are of non-metallic construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and toys; toy vehicles; toy robots; toy three dimensional structures; apparatus for games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; toys that are portable; toys that are of modular construction; toys that are made up of modular components or modular sets; toy kits; toy construction sets made up of modular components; toys that are ride-on toy cars; toys that are toy construction sets; and toys that are go-karts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |