CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OAKSTERDAM HYDROPONICS BLOWING THE COMPETITION AWAY

USPTO serial 85014828

OAKSTERDAM HYDROPONICS BLOWING THE COMPETITION AWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OAKSTERDAM HYDROPONICS BLOWING THE COMPETITION AWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven K. Lee

STEVEN K. LEE DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP591 REDWOOD HWY FRONTAGE RD STE 1200MILL VALLEY, CA 94941-6000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Growing media for plants; plant food; plant nutrition preparations; preparations for fortifying plants; plant nutrients for hydroponic and horticultural useACTIVE—
011lighting fixtures; lighting systems comprised of lamps, wires, ballasts, bulbs, and hoodsACTIVE—
021hydroponic plant growing system consisting of a nutrient solution container, growing chamber, pots, and growing media, sold as a unit; plant growing trays; plant growing pots; planters for flowers and plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 17, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance