USPTO serial 85014968
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry E. Bretschneider
BARRY E. BRETSCHNEIDER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP1650 TYSONS BLVD STE 400MC LEAN, VA 22102-4880UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring devices for measuring distance between cars by using laser beam; radar devices for sensing distance between cars; automatic controller for controlling distance between cars; obstacle detection device for automobiles; pedestrian detection devices for automobiles; sensors for measuring incidence of light from outside of car; electric automatic door openers and closers; electronic keys incorporating electronic circuit for remote opening and closing of car doors and remote starting of engines; remote opening and closing devices for car doors to respond to electronic keys incorporating electronic circuit; keyless entry and ignition switch systems for automotive vehicles comprised of remote controllers and receivers installed in cars; passive entry systems including remote controller and a receiver installed in the car; immobilizer systems including remote controllers and receivers installed in cars; remote controllers for starting car engines; portable electronic devices for remote monitoring charging status of electric cars; remote control devices for charging electric cars; remote control devices for operating in-car devices; in-car electronic image processor; electronic image processor; in-car image sensors, namely, image sensors for monitoring areas within and surrounding cars; central processing units for controlling car automatic sliding car doors; central processing units for controlling automatic car tailgates; central processing units for controlling lightning-up or switching-off of car room lamps; central processing units for controlling lighting-up, switching-off or irradiation angle of headlights; central processing units for monitoring and controlling of charge and discharge of car batteries; headlight turn-on/off controller operated by detecting the brightness of area surrounding a car; controller for detecting turn direction of car and adjusting irradiation direction and area of headlight of car; centering apparatus for door mirror; electronic opening and closing switch for car windows; electronic hazard switch; electronic steering switch; electronic door lock switch; electronic window lock switch; trapping prevention control devices, namely, control apparatus for jam protection for car doors and windows; electronic opening and closing switch for side stand for motorcycle; electronic apparatus for adjusting position of electric car seat; dc/dc converters and dc/ac converters; alarm devices detecting air failure of automobile-tire through various sensors; tire pressure transmitters; tire pressure receivers; electric opening and closing system for car window | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Power steering devices, namely, electronic power steering equipment and electronic hydraulic power steering equipment; key illumination devices, namely, lights for illumination of ignition keyholes of automobile | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |