USPTO serial 85015130
SO EASY GUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SO EASY GUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dwayne K. Goetzel
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL MEYERTONS, HOOD, KIVLIN, KOWERT & GOETZEL, P.C.PO BOX 398AUSTIN, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, computer software for managing the computing requirements of a business in the areas of accounting, manufacturing, distribution, retailing, services, rental, project management and costing, maintenance management, forecasting, customer and supplier relationship management, inventory and warehouse management, quality management, web sales, supply chains, mobility solutions, scheduling, payroll and human resources | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, training manuals concerning computer software; publications, namely, instructional, training, operational, reference and informational brochures, training manuals and newsletters, in the field of enterprise resource planning and other information technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store, wholesale store and online retail store services featuring computer software and other information technology products; enterprise resource planning, namely, business analysis and business strategic planning services in the technology industry, assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization, business-to-business planning, and assistance with business management and planning; business management; professional business consultation services; business research; compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; recruitment and personnel management services, namely, personnel placement and recruitment, management and business consulting services in the field of training and recruitment; personnel management services; employment agency services, namely, filling the temporary and permanent staffing needs of businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and training services, namely, providing live and on-line seminars, workshops, conferences and individual education and training in the field of enterprise resource planning and information technology; arranging and conducting live and on-line educational seminars and conferences in the field of enterprise resource planning and information technology; providing non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of brochures, newsletters and training manuals in the field of enterprise resource planning and information technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, development, consultation, installation and maintenance services for business software in the areas of accounting, manufacturing, distribution, retailing, services, rental, project management and costing, maintenance management, forecasting, customer and supplier relationship management, inventory and warehouse management, quality management, web sales, supply chain, mobility solutions, scheduling, payroll and human resources; information technology services, namely, information technology consultation, and planning, design and management of information technology systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pronto Software Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SO EASY GUIDE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |