CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KICKSPIKE

USPTO serial 85015187

KICKSPIKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KICKSPIKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna L. Caswell

DONNA L. CASWELL HORSEPOWER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWUNIT 206 - 3500 CARRINGTON ROADWESTBANK, BC, V4T3C1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective FootwearACTIVE—
025FOOTWEAR; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, GOLF FOOTWEAR, FOOTWEAR FOR USE OUTDOORS, WORK FOOTWEAR, FOOTWEAR FOR USE BY MILITARY PERSONNEL, AND CASUAL FOOTWEARACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 9, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance