USPTO serial 85015407
SWAG BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWAG BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agency specializing in the design and execution of word of mouth, viral, buzz and experiential marketing programs; Advertising and business services, namely, providing an online website where advertisers, marketers, and content providers can interact with users for advertising, branding, and promoting knowledge, products, and services, and tradeshows, on behalf of themselves and others, and for evaluating and rating the same, all the foregoing relevant to human activities affecting climate change and related fields; Advertising and marketing; Advertising and marketing consultancy; Advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; Advertising services, namely, promoting and marketing the goods and services of others in the field of upscale choices such as cultural events, restaurants, shopping, and travel via print and electronic media; Advertising services, namely, promoting and marketing the goods and services of others through all public communication means; Advertising services, public relations and marketing services, namely, promoting and marketing the goods and services of others through all public communication means; Advertising, marketing and promotion services; Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Analysis of market research data and statistics; Arranging and conducting marketing promotional events for others; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, business organization, marketing and customer analysis; Branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for businesses; Business advice and analysis of markets; Business consultation and management regarding marketing activities and launching of new products; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, production, personnel and retail sale matters; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, sales, operation, product design particularly specializing in the use of analytic and statistic models for the understanding and predicting of consumers, businesses, and market trends and actions; Business marketing consulting services; Business marketing services; Business to business direct marketing services; Collection of market research information; Conducting business and market research surveys; Conducting market surveys; Conducting marketing studies; Consulting services in the field of internet marketing; Consulting services in the field of marketing of educational training; Consumer marketing research and consulting related thereto; Consumer strategy business consulting in the fields of marketing, sales, operation, and product design particularly specializing in the use of analytic models for the understanding and predicting of consumer, business, and retail market trends and actions; Cooperative advertising and marketing; Cooperative advertising and marketing services by way of solicitation, customer service and providing marketing information via web sites on a global computer network; Creation of marketing tools designed to increase a client company's knowledge of customer needs, and its competitors' products and services, pricing, advertising strategy and sales strategy; Creative marketing design services; Development of marketing strategies and concepts; Direct marketing; Direct marketing advertising for others; Direct marketing consulting services; Market analysis; Market analysis and research services; Market assessment services; Market manipulation, research and analysis, whether or not via the internet; Market reports and studies; Market research and business analyses; Market research by means of a computer database; Market research consultation; Market research services; Market research studies; Market segmentation consultation; Market study and analysis of market studies; Marketing analysis services; Marketing and branding services, namely, performing consumer insight and brand strategy of company logos; Marketing consulting; Marketing plan development; Marketing research services; Marketing services in the field of planned-giving for non-profit and charitable organizations; Marketing services, namely, conducting consumer tracking behavior research and consumer trend analysis; Marketing services, namely, consumer marketing research; Marketing services, namely, providing informational web pages designed to generate sales traffic via hyperlinks to other web sites; Marketing, advertising and promoting the goods and services of others in the field of travel and tourism, namely, providing information via mail and electronic mail; Marketing, advertising, and promoting the retail goods and services of others to wireless electronic devices; Marketing, promotional and advertising services provided by mobile telephone connections; Media planning, namely, advising the client on the correct times and stations to advertise based on media analysis of the market for that media; On-line advertising and marketing services; Planning, design, development, maintenance, tracking and reporting of online marketing activities for third parties; Promoting, advertising and marketing of the on-line web sites of others; Promotion and marketing services and related consulting; Promotion, advertising and marketing of on-line websites; Promotional marketing and representation services for sales to the public sector; Promotional services, namely, guerrilla marketing services; Providing business marketing information; Providing information in the field of marketing and on-line marketing media via the Internet; Providing marketing and promotion of special events; Providing online business management services including accounting, marketing, business project management, and business development; Providing public sector go-to-market advice and strategies; Provision of market research information; Provision of marketing reports; Statistical evaluations of marketing data; The bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods and services, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods and services from an Internet web site particularly specializing in the marketing of the sale of goods and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Feb 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |