Drawing for CHESTER'S CHOPHOUSE & WINE BAR

USPTO serial 85015573

CHESTER'S CHOPHOUSE & WINE BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHESTER'S CHOPHOUSE & WINE BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William P. Matthews

WILLIAM P MATTHEWS FOULSTON SIEFKIN LLP1551 N WATERFRONT PKWY STE 100WICHITA, KS 67206-4466UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar services featuring fine dining and table service; wine bar servicesACTIVEMay 16, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 13, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 13, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 8, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 19, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 18, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 18, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 22, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance