Drawing for BONDFACTOR

USPTO serial 85015673

BONDFACTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONDFACTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly A. Eckhart

KIMBERLY A. ECKHART WINSTON & STRAWN LLP101 CALIFORNIA ST STE 3900SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5894UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services, namely, underwriting financial guaranty insurance and reinsurance of municipal, corporate and structured finance obligations; financial management and consulting in the field of municipal and corporate bonds; financial investment in the field of municipal and corporate bonds; financial services, namely, providing financial analysis, financial research and investment research services in the field of municipal and corporate bondsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 1, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 22, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 17, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance