Drawing for CLEARLY GREEN

USPTO serial 85016533

CLEARLY GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CLEARLY GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Power Jr

JAMES A. POWER JR POWER DEL VALLE LLP233 W 72ND STNEW YORK, NY 10023-2788UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003carpet cleaning, neutralizing, extracting and foam- and gum-inhibiting compounds; bathroom cleaning compounds, drain opening and maintaining compounds; glass and mirror cleaning compounds; paint removing compounds; oven and grill cleaning compounds; degreasing compounds; compounds for cleaning and polishing stainless steel and metal surfaces; dust mop treatments; wipes impregnated with cleaning compounds; furniture polish; microfiber wipes impregnated with cleaning compounds; polishing compounds; soaps; treated dust wipes; organic acid bathroom cleaners; floor cleaning and maintaining compounds; floor polishing and buffing compounds; floor stripping compounds; baseboard stripping compoundsACTIVE—
005kitchen and bathroom disinfectants; disinfectant cleaners for animal facilities; sanitizing towels; general purpose disinfecting cleanersACTIVE—
009batteries, automatic paper dispensers, automatic soap dispensersACTIVE—
011electric lamps, electric light bulbs, fluorescent lighting tubes, compact fluorescent lights, carpet dryers, air moversACTIVE—
016reusable shopping and carry bags, trash can liners, bio-hazard bags; sanitary napkin bags, printed signsACTIVE—
021pails, mop buckets with ringers, floor squeegees, water wands, brooms, mops, brushes, spray bottles, spray nozzles, manual pumps and sprayers, sponges, scrubbing pads, pumice scouring sticks, microfiber dust mops, string mops, non-metallic paper and soap dispensersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance