USPTO serial 85016796
COMPLETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPLETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. McDonald, Reg. No. 29,193
ROBERT E McDONALD THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY101 W PROSPECT AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115-1075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Automotive Paints | ACTIVE | Sep 3, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |