CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CHOWDAH

USPTO serial 85016876

CHOWDAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOWDAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peri Fluger

Peri Fluger Rhoads & Sinon LLP213 Market Street P.O. Box 1146Harrisburg, PA 17101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Beer mugs, Coffee cups, tea cups and mugs , Cups and Earthenware mugs, Glass mugs, Mug trees, Mugs, Beverage glassware, namely, pint glasses and shot glasses, Drinking glasses, Bowls, Bowls made of precious metal, Finger bowls, Fruit bowls, Glass bowls, Japanese rice bowls, Mixing bowls, Pet feeding and drinking bowls, Salad bowls, Serving bowlsACTIVE—
024Beach towels; bed blankets; blankets for outdoor useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 29, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 29, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance