USPTO serial 85017200
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eduardo Durnhofer
9605 MEDICAL CENTER DR STE 105ROCKVILLE, MD 20850-6381UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Diagnostic preparations for scientific or research use; Diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory use; Diagnostic preparations for scientific or research use; Diagnostic preparations for scientific use; Diagnostic preparations used in science; Diagnostic reagents for clinical or medical laboratory use; Diagnostic reagents for scientific or research use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Diagnostic agents, preparations and substances for medical purposes; Diagnostic preparations for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Animation and special-effects design for others; Bacteriological research; Bacteriological research and testing; Biological research; Chemical, biochemical, biological and bacteriological research and analysis; Compiling data for research purposes in the field of medical science and medical consultancy; Consulting services in the fields of biotechnology, pharmaceutical research and development and genetic science; Consulting services in the fields of biotechnology, pharmaceutical research and development, laboratory testing, diagnostics, and pharmacogenetics; Design and creation of computer-modeled versions of human beings using computer animation for use in movies, television, internet and other applications; Design and creation of computer-modeled versions of human beings using computer animation for use in movies, television, internet, games and other applications; Laboratory research in the field of life sciences; Medical and scientific research in the field of life sciences; Medical and scientific research information in the field of life sciences; Medical and scientific research services in the field of cancer treatment and diagnosis; Medical and scientific research, namely, conducting clinical trials; Medical research; Medical research services in the field of cancer; Pharmaceutical research and development; Pharmaceutical research services; Providing medical and scientific research information in the field of clinical trials; Providing medical and scientific research information in the field of pharmaceuticals and clinical trials; Providing medical and scientific research information in the fields of pharmaceuticals and genetics; Providing medical testing services and information in the field of cancer research and disease classification; Research and development and consultation related thereto in the field of life sciences; Research and development in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields; Research and development of 3D content, 3D technology and processes, stereoscopic 3D projection, 3D animation technology, 3D processing power, 3D techniques, and flexible forward projection; Research and development of vaccines and medicines; Scientific research; Scientific research and development; Scientific research for medical purposes in the area of cancerous diseases | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2010 |
| 044 | Consulting services in the fields of diagnostic medical testing and nutrition; Medical diagnostic testing, monitoring and reporting services; Medical testing for diagnostic or treatment purposes | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2010 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |