USPTO serial 85017693
DIRECTO.COM TALK TO THE WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRECTO.COM TALK TO THE WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUBEN ALCOBA
RUBEN ALCOBA ALCOBA & ASSOCIATES PA3399 NW 72ND AVE STE 211MIAMI, FL 33122-1343UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Long distance telephone communication services; Prepaid long distance telephone services; Telecommunications reseller services, namely, providing long distance telecommunication services | PARTIALLY PAID | Jan 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |