Drawing for ORTHO NEURO TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 85017724

ORTHO NEURO TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4335191Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 14, 2013
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ORTHO NEURO TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen S. Ford

Stephen S. Ford STOLOWITZ FORD COWGER LLP1140 SW 11TH AVENUE, SUITE 400PORTLAND, OR 97205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus therapeutic device, namely, therapeutic manipulation monitor for simulating and tracking an amount of compressive displacement applied during therapeutic manipulation procedure by a therapistSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 9, 2010
041Providing continuing medical education coursesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 9, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2019C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
May 14, 2018REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 31, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 9, 2013SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2013REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2013CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 1, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 30, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 30, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 30, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 1, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 1, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance