Drawing for PROFESSIONAL CHEF SERVEWARE

USPTO serial 85018073

PROFESSIONAL CHEF SERVEWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PROFESSIONAL CHEF SERVEWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. William McLaughlin

F. WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN WOOD PHILLIPS500 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021dinnerware, namely, plates and serving traysACTIVEFeb 11, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 27, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance