Drawing for THE RISE AND FALL OF ZIGGY STARDUST AND THE SPIDERS FROM MARS

USPTO serial 85018448

THE RISE AND FALL OF ZIGGY STARDUST AND THE SPIDERS FROM MARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE RISE AND FALL OF ZIGGY STARDUST AND THE SPIDERS FROM MARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

JEFFREY C. KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAY FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10019-4379UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion picture films featuring music and entertainment performances; documentary films featuring music and entertainment performancesACTIVE—
035Online ordering services featuring general consumer merchandiseACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely live performances in the nature of plays, concerts, musical performances and other stage performances; production of theatrical shows and other live entertainment events and performances; providing online information relating to the foregoing via an Internet website; providing online entertainment related to the foregoing in the nature of non-downloadable musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, and photographsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 28, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 2, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 2, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance