USPTO serial 85019114
FRIGHTFEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4580297Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2014
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRIGHTFEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
Santa Monica, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
Santa Monica, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
Santa Monica, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AnaLisa Valle
LIGHTNING ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC301 ARIZONA AVE SUITE 400SANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital Media, namely, DVDs, downloadable image files and downloadable video files featuring horror-related subject matter excluding public Halloween events | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lightning Entertainment Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FRIGHTFEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2020 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |