USPTO serial 85019180
RESEARCH PANEL ASIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4047126Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2011
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RESEARCH PANEL ASIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence J. Crain
AMY C. ZIEGLER GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD.300 S WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606-6752UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and publicity services; distribution of samples of products; issuing and managing coupons for promoting products and services of others; planning promotions for products and services, and implementing such promotions on behalf of other parties; promoting the goods of others, namely, issuing and processing trading stamps, coupons, point cards, and discount cards for the goods of others; conducting market research; public-opinion polling; conducting test-user market surveys; conducting questionnaire market surveys; compiling and analyzing results of marketing research, public-opinion polling, test-user market surveys, and questionnaire market surveys, and providing information related thereto; analyzing business-management policies and practices, and providing consultancy services regarding same; mediation of product-sales contracts; providing information about commercial sales; systemizing, compiling, and entering information into computer databases, and consulting and advisory services related thereto; providing and rental of advertising space on the internet; providing office functions, namely, filing documents and magnetic tape; providing employment agency services; providing employment information services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 7, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |